|
I
wrote several weeks back about the plight of the
Massachusetts Clean Elections Law. The Clean Elections
bill did pass in both the House of Representatives and
the Senate. But
in cunning move, opponents of the Clean Election Law in
the House - lead by the powerful house leadership -
essentially gutted all funding for the Clean Elections
Law. The Clean Elections Law is worthless without any
money to back it up. After all, what incumbent is going
to opt into a system with no pay-off?
And a bankrupt Clean Elections fund can't provide
assistance to potential candidates.
Clean
elections aside, how do those guys get away with killing
a piece of legislation that had the overwhelming support
of the electorate? I'm sorry, but do I hear faint echoes
of "screw you" coming from the Statehouse?
Here in the Pioneer Valley, we can be proud of
legislators Steve Kulik, John Merrigan and Ellen Story
who supported the Clean Elections Law to the bitter end.
But from what I can gather about the rules of engagement
at the Statehouse, standing up for what their
constituents want - if it's not what the leadership
wants - may come back to haunt our representatives later
on.
I
intend to be watching the Statehouse closely for the
next few months. I have several questions I want
answered. Among them: Why do so few seem to have so much
power in the House? How democratic is that? Didn't their
mothers teach them to play fair?
And more importantly, how does this impact us and
what can we do about it?
I
hope you'll come along as I learn more about what goes
on in the Statehouse. What do you know about fair play
in the Statehouse?
And how does it affect how we are represented?
Share your opinions and insights with me and I'll
publish them in Valley Viewpoint. E-mail me at info2005@valleyviewpoint.com
For
the latest in the Clean Elections campaign go to www.massvoters.org
What's
Your Viewpoint?
Tell
us what you think about this or any other issue.
E-mail us at info2005@valleyviewpoint.com.
|