
Your
Viewpoint: Bad Medicine
by guest columnist Dale Moss
Is
anyone surprised or shocked that the spanking new
Homeland Security Law includes a provision protecting
the drug company Eli Lilly from lawsuits? No, this has
nothing to do with vaccines in production for the fight
against terrorism. This Scrooge clause shields Eli Lilly
from litigation over vaccines routinely given very young
children, vaccines that have been linked ineradicably in
the minds of many parents to the development of autism
in their little ones. To me, this protective exemption
typifies so much of what’s wrong with present-day
America: bad science, bad medicine, and corporations
denying any culpability for either.
Recently
The New York Times reported that the Bush
administration’s plans for vaccination against
smallpox would have to be throttled back because there
was such a small supply of vaccinia immune globulin (VIG),
the single known antidote to severe adverse reactions
from the smallpox vaccine. Back in 1968, when smallpox
inoculations were still routine, studies found one
life-threatening reaction in 20,000 to 67,000
inoculations. In these cases the cowpox that forms the
basis of the vaccine proliferates wildly, but instead of
producing just fevers and sore arms, it "leaves its
victims scarred, blinded, or sometimes dead."
Now,
however, the predictions are for one serious reaction
per 8,000 inoculations, which makes the need for VIG far
more pressing. The likelihood of a life-threatening
reaction has increased not because the vaccine is
"stronger," but because, as the Times noted,
far more Americans have immune systems weakened by
disease or immuno-suppressive therapy and far more have
eczema than in 1968, when studies of adverse reactions
were last done.
Recently
the Times went so far as to suggest that millions
of Americans should not be vaccinated for smallpox
because of pre-existing ailments that put them "at
risk for serious side effects." This includes an
estimated fifteen million Americans who have eczema,
over two million suffering from rheumatoid arthritis,
another two million with lupus, over half a million with
HIV and AIDS, nearly a quarter of a million who have
organ transplants, and the 1.3 million new cases of
cancer diagnosed each year.
This
vastly understates the problem.
Many
disorders are immunologically-mediated, meaning that the
immune system is intimately involved in the disease
process. Immunologically-mediated diseases such as
asthma and diabetes are also far more widespread now
than they were three decades ago, and many if not most
people with immunologically-mediated disorders must be
considered immuno-compromised, hence more vulnerable to
adverse reactions from vaccinations of any type.
The
very important question no one seems to be asking is why
are disorders of the immune system so much more common
now than even a generation ago — so much more common
that there is a three- to eight-fold increase in the
number of serious reactions likely to occur to smallpox
vaccine?
Years
ago, I thought homeopaths crazy for opposing routine
vaccinations. Now, understanding their reasoning and
seeing it confirmed by the rampant increase in chronic
immunologically-mediated diseases, I have to agree.
Quite apart from the questionable validity of the
smallpox threat, we vaccinate too often, too young, and
with too little regard for the potential damage we are
doing.
Dr.
Timothy Dooley, N.D., recently voiced what many
homeopaths believe: that the runaway increase in both
autism and asthma is largely attributable to massive,
indiscriminate vaccination of our young. Yes, mercuric
preservatives like thimerosal, the basis of much
litigation against Eli Lilly, may be partly to blame,
but injecting foreign proteins into immune and nervous
systems too immature to tolerate them is the real
culprit. Don’t we know enough about developmental
physiology to realize how risky this is? To me, the
"science" of it is on a par with medicine’s
credo, until fairly recently, that preemies and newborns
didn’t feel pain or require anesthesia for operations.
There’s
a nasty confluence of commercial and cultural values
that makes us unquestioningly accept the notion that all
disease is bad and symptoms nuisances that need not be
endured. It blinds us to the purpose and real value of
childhood ailments like measles, mumps, and chickenpox:
the immature immune system must be challenged to develop
properly. So vaccines that relieve our children of the
itchy scabs of chicken pox or the swollen parotids of
mumps may leave them more vulnerable to meningitis
later.
Yes,
there are vaccines, like that against tetanus, that
serve a useful purpose because they protect against
diseases for which there are no treatments. But much of
the rest is overkill, figuratively and maybe even
literally. Vaccinations and ever-growing use of
pharmaceuticals and antibiotics have not made us
healthier as a people, any more than fast foods have
made us better nourished.
Dale
C. Moss is a writer and consultant in classical
homeopathy who lives in Massachusetts. She does not plan
to receive a smallpox vaccination.
(Back
to Viewpoints)
|